Wholesaling
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 7 years ago,
Assignment of Contract and Terms - Buyer Pays Closing Costs
Hello All!
I've read material through various resources that buyer pays closing costs as long as it's put in the agreement.
My questions are... Is this happening in today's market or in your current business model? When the "we buy ugly houses" people mention they pay all closing costs, are those for certain exit strategies and/or having the potential buyer pay for all?
I assume for some deals and strategies there's a big enough margin to cover all but I'm curious if there's a rule or something.
I'm a licensed agent and there hasn't been a time where my buyer's have had to bring money to the table, and that's one of their biggest requests. So I feel it's definitely a limiting factor to a sale.
I feel like I'd be narrowing down my possibilities of a successful transaction telling the seller I'll cover it and expect a unrepresented buyer working on their credit to bring a huge EMD, Purchase Option, and/or pay elevated rent.
My strategies of interest right now are sub-2, lease options with terms and ACTS. I've spoken to a few sellers with enough equity to develop a relationship but some of these FSBOs are smart. Seeing no point in paying me a fee or ability to collect the difference to be an additional resource to get it sold. Now let me add they're more on the "want" to sell side, but still bringing up good questions in which I'd like to have the answer to.
What are some of your strategies in place for today's market? Every seller I speak to sounds like they just got off the phone with an investor who has read the same book, gone through the same course, and probably listening to the same podcasts. I remember hearing on Ron Legrand's CD all six of them from the interview table said "what competition?" for various understandable reasons, but damn am I seeing some competition. One of my investor client's I'm representing is learning the hard way that the 70% MAO rule is not applicable in my market. Highest and best essentially.
Any and all advice is welcome. Thanks in advance for all your help and wisdom. Now let's get to work!