Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
8
Votes
Seti Gershberg
  • Specialist
  • Phoenix, AZ
8
Votes |
21
Posts

Help with "Shorting a Second" in a "Subject To" Transaction

Seti Gershberg
  • Specialist
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

I recently saw a presentation on Subject To transactions and the presenter suggested an advanced concept that involved buying a property that was underwater and had two mortgages. He mentioned you could short the second and create substantial equity. The presentation was basic so he did not go into detail on the concept. I wonder if an advanced investor would be able to explain this concept in further detail?

Many thanks.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,293
Posts
500
Votes
Brett Goldsmith
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
500
Votes |
1,293
Posts
Brett Goldsmith
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

I've done these a few times. Basically when a 2nd is underwater you may be able to offer them a settlement. This is generally on charged off subordinate liens. For example; Home is worth 1.4M AS-IS. 1st MTG is 1.25M. 2nd MTG is 700k. Home is underwater. 2nd MTG thinks the home is worth 1.2M. You settle the 700k for around 70k as they think it's dead debt. You created equity.

You find people in their primary's trying to do things like this who are in these posistions.

If a seller would let you try to settle their 2nd and then they also let you take it subject-to prior to settling the debt, it's possible. If it makes sense, it makes sense right...

Loading replies...