Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

49
Posts
2
Votes
Jim Witten
  • Walnut Creek, CA
2
Votes |
49
Posts

Why Would Seller Sign a Contract without POF?

Jim Witten
  • Walnut Creek, CA
Posted

Live in the Bay Area, had a lead on a off-market property that was soon to go on MLS. An investor of mine that buys in cash wanted me to get it under contract first before he looked at it. But it was unlikely he would even be interested in buying it, it was preliminary.

If I approached the owners and asked them to sign a contract that was all-cash, wouldn't they sensibly want proof of funds? Some type of seriousness? Why would they waste their time giving me a contract with a big unknown as to whether I'll even buy it?

Loading replies...