Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

50
Posts
14
Votes
Eric NA
  • Accountant
  • Denver, CO
14
Votes |
50
Posts

Rental Property Vs. Flip buyer

Eric NA
  • Accountant
  • Denver, CO
Posted

What's the difference between getting a property under contract with the intent to market to flippers vs landlords?

Obviously if the price is right, both will be interested. Should I stick with my formula (ARV * .70 - repair costs (including fudge factor) - my profit) to come up with what I want to get the property under contract for at all times or should I run it from a landlords perspective as well?

When marketing the property, should I market it as what the potential flipper can make and let the landlord figure out the numbers for himself, or should I market it was both perspectives?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,981
Posts
659
Votes
Ryan Webber
  • Wholesaler
  • Amarillo, TX
659
Votes |
1,981
Posts
Ryan Webber
  • Wholesaler
  • Amarillo, TX
Replied

I think it absolutely makes a difference.

The 70% formula is a rehabber formula. It is designed to quickly figure holding costs, resell costs, and profit margin.

When I first started I used to figure all my numbers and percentages every time I looked at a potential rehab. When I came across the 70% formula I noticed it came out roughly with the same number that took me 20 minutes to figure but instead it took me about 10 seconds.

Again the 70% of ARV minus repairs formula (or one of its cousins) is an easy shortcut for rehabbers to figure out their maximum offer to make 15-20% profit, which I've found to be roughly industry standard.

If you are looking to sell a property as a rental, a 70% discount might not be enough for it to cash flow OR it might cash flow adequately at 80% or even 100% of ARV.

I just had this conversation in another thread, but one of my best rental properties I bought for full retail value. It was a fourplex and because of the seller's financing terms, it netted me $200 per door per month the first year. With the property rented out and in good condition, my measly $5,000 down payment seemed magical. It was well over a 100% ROI.

Point being, landlords priority is not equity. It's cash flow. If you want to market to landlords then learn what they are looking for. Learn their cash flow numbers. 70% of ARV might be a good rental or it might not. You need to learn when it is and when its not if you are going to market to landlords.

Loading replies...