Wholesaling
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 8 years ago,
Studs vs existing walls and debris. What takes longer to sell?
For my questions below, imagine a vacant house of 4 years with roof damage (so expect drywall damage, mold etc)
Wholesalers - If you have a house gutted and down to the studs and bones, are your investors more hesitant or less hesitant to buy than if the walls were up and debris scattered around?
Investors - Are you more, or less likely to buy the property if all you see are studs and subfloor vs existing dirty carpet, damaged drywall and old furniture etc. Do you immediately think the cost of repairs will be more, or less if all you see are studs?
Do you feel this depends on the experience level of the investors? I don't believe this will make a difference, but I'm in the Atlanta area. (Snag a few people with the Keyword 😉)