Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

624
Posts
375
Votes
Jesse LeBlanc
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
375
Votes |
624
Posts

Studs vs existing walls and debris. What takes longer to sell?

Jesse LeBlanc
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
Posted
For my questions below, imagine a vacant house of 4 years with roof damage (so expect drywall damage, mold etc) Wholesalers - If you have a house gutted and down to the studs and bones, are your investors more hesitant or less hesitant to buy than if the walls were up and debris scattered around? Investors - Are you more, or less likely to buy the property if all you see are studs and subfloor vs existing dirty carpet, damaged drywall and old furniture etc. Do you immediately think the cost of repairs will be more, or less if all you see are studs? Do you feel this depends on the experience level of the investors? I don't believe this will make a difference, but I'm in the Atlanta area. (Snag a few people with the Keyword 😉)

Loading replies...