Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Daniel Ojeda
  • Pomona, CA
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Legalities of an old deal

Daniel Ojeda
  • Pomona, CA
Posted

Hello there.. this is the situation..

Back in 1996, a family bought a house for about 128k. I looked through some paper work and saw that the first real estate loan they received was for about 105k. So that gives me an idea of what the downpayment was. Now, under all public records Ive come across, including propertyshark, the title was transferred for 37k. The old owner is listed as party 1 and the family (husband and wife) as party 2. It shows that the family acquired title for 37k, which means the seller was very motivated to sell. However, we know the family signed a deal for 128k. Its obvious someone wholesaled the deal and made a killing.. but Im wondering why it shows that the old owner transferred title to the family for 37k. Shouldnt the sale appear for 128? Afterall, the wholesaler must have been the one who acquired the property for 37.. Id appreciate some input on this.. thanks!

Loading replies...