Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

105
Posts
41
Votes
Joshua Durrin
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Alameda, CA
41
Votes |
105
Posts

Applying Rules of Thumb to Inflated Markets

Joshua Durrin
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Alameda, CA
Posted

Hi there,

I'm looking to do some wholesaling in the east bay. However, when one considers the discount on the property after applying the 70% ARV rule of thumb, that's a pretty sizable chunk of money in this inflated market. Given a retail value of $600k, 30% discount on that is $180k. Is that still a reasonable discount or is the rule of thumb to be adjusted for higher ARV properties?

My understanding is that the rule of thumb is typical on a ~$160k property, thus equating to about a $48k profit margin.  Naturally, $180k is far different than $48k.  One can also argue that the risk is greater with a $600k house versus a $160k house.  But does that alone justify the huge margin in comparison? 

Loading replies...