Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

17
Posts
0
Votes
Mark S.
  • Pittsburgh, PA
0
Votes |
17
Posts

Critique my list criteria

Mark S.
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Posted

I'm looking to begin wholesaling in my area and I have been trying to obtain a list of absentee owners. I have come up with the following criteria:

Out of state absentee owners

my zip code + 20 mile radius

2+ bedrooms

$30k plus in equity and 50% plus in equity

Last market recording date 2006 and earlier

Property type: SFR, Multi, Duplex

No corporate or trust owned

I've come up with 439 names, which I think is manageable since I'll be head chef and bottle washer for this project. I plan to send a yellow letter to all of them this month and follow up with post card/yellow letters for consecutive months.

Is my list missing anything? Is 439 a good number to start with?

Loading replies...