Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Legal & Legislation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

119
Posts
59
Votes
Dan N.
59
Votes |
119
Posts

Liability Coverage for a house within an LLC

Dan N.
Posted

I am in the process of buying a $170K house. I plan to own it in an LLC.
I am quoting insurance companies and for liability coverage, I was wondering if the liability coverage should be approximately the same value of assets that are within the LLC (in this case, 1 house of $170K), or, should I have a much larger liability coverage ($500K-$1M)?

*No need to mention to me umbrella policies. I am aware but unfortunately they are not relevant to this discussion.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,836
Posts
1,376
Votes
Frank Chin
  • Investor
  • Bayside, NY
1,376
Votes |
1,836
Posts
Frank Chin
  • Investor
  • Bayside, NY
Replied

@Dan N.

Liability coverage has nothing to do with the value of the asset. It has everything to do with what litigants can sue you for. If you owned a property with a broken stairwell where someone trips and falls, got incapacitated for life, why would their damages be restricted to $170K. I bought a business where the prior owner was sued for $3 million causing injuries to some customers. I was familiar with details of the case after I took over the business and his employees who has to take time off from work to attend depositions.

What happed in that lawsuit? The owner had $1 million liability insurance. The litigant attorney only learned the owner moved to Florida after selling the business and bought a home there. Because of the state's homestead laws, they cannot sue and take the million-dollar home. My employee was giggling when they told me the attorney taking testimony from them banged on the table, angry and yelling "we got screwed". They settled for the $1 million.

As to umbrella insurance being not relevant, I spoke to the owner a little later, he also thought the liability insurance was irrelevant little realizing that's what saved his hide. He knew nothing about Florida's homestead laws either as many in New York back then retire to Florida. He got away easy without realizing how lucky he was.

I owned several rentals back then and the business and my insurance agent thought $3 million umbrella coverage overall should be enough. Adding another million or two didn't cost that much back then. The $3 million number had nothing to do with the value of my rentals or business, but how large a lawsuit would be if something happens.

One more thing. Attorneys tell me having the LLC means little as they'll sue the owner personally and the LLC for negligence anyway.

Loading replies...