Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Legal & Legislation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
8
Votes
Simon Lee
  • Investor
  • Sonoma County
8
Votes |
10
Posts

CA resident with out of state properties/entity options/alternatives to incumbents

Simon Lee
  • Investor
  • Sonoma County
Posted

Are there alternatives to Anderson and Royal Legal Services for the formation of a Statutory Trust (Wyoming or Delaware)? From forum posts on here, it seems like both have had client service issues recently. I don’t mind going with them, but I’d like to hear of alternatives if possible.

I'm based in CA and plan on rapidly scaling this year with 2-3 out of state properties and perhaps 4 to 5 next year, so I'm trying to build the proper asset protection/liability and for tax optimization purposes would like to avoid the CA FTB franchise tax per LLC.

My understanding is that the de-facto standard for doing this is with Delaware or Wyoming Statutory Trusts with properties held in Land Trusts, and then possibly layered with an operating and holding LLC. Ideally, I'd

The alternative (but maybe temporary) loophole that has been floated around is to use a disregarded limited partnership in CA as there was a 2019 FTB ruling saying that they are not subject to the $800 franchise fee.

I’ve talked to a few lawyers about how to structure things and they say they would have to “refer” me out and would get back to me. I’ve tried searching on avvo.com but virtually all the results for trusts are for estate purposes.

I’m actually subscribed to a new all-inclusive financial management platform/service that is supposed to do it all (access to CFP/CPA/attorney, tax strategy/filing, trust document formation, review insurance policies, cash flow analysis, etc), but it seems like every question I ask them they are hearing for the first time and aren’t even sure it is covered by their service even though they advertise that they do it all.

Thanks gurus!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,727
Posts
1,851
Votes
Travis Biziorek
  • Investor
  • Arroyo Grande, CA
1,851
Votes |
1,727
Posts
Travis Biziorek
  • Investor
  • Arroyo Grande, CA
Replied

Hey Simon, I scaled from 0-12 doors in about 2.5 years.

You know what my legal structure looked like? 

Buying everything in my personal name and carrying a large umbrella insurance policy.

It's highly unlikely your LLC structure is going to protect you if push comes to shove. That's not what your lawyer is going to tell you, of course. But they make money when you create these complex structures.

Spending a lot of time on this is also a great way to head down the analysis paralysis rabbit hole. It's preventing you from actually getting started.

I remember thinking through all this in the beginning as well. I got frustrated that I was spending all my time and energy on something that wasn't moving the needle forward. 

Finally, I asked my lawyer one basic question: "How many times have you seen a client with the proper LLC setup sued and ultimately have the LLC provide the protection it is supposed to provide".

Silence... then, sheepishly, "none".

That was all I needed to hear.

Loading replies...