Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Medium-Term Rentals
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

128
Posts
121
Votes
Alex L.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Youngstown, OH
121
Votes |
128
Posts

Travel Nurse Housing: Is There a Demand for 3+ Bedrooms?

Alex L.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Youngstown, OH
Posted

I've got a couple of 3 bedroom SFHs that I'm in the process of rehabbing, and am toying with the notion of listing them as MTR for travel nurses. I've noticed that, in my area, most travel nurse housing listed on Furnished Finder is 1 and 2 bedrooms. There seems to be a severe lack for 3 bedroom rentals, although that doesn't necessarily mean there could be a demand, either.

Does anyone with experience renting to travel nurses have any words of wisdom in this regard? I'd like to think that 3 bedrooms would be nice for those traveling with family/kids, but I could be entirely wrong.

Loading replies...