Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
House Hacking
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 8 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
0
Votes
Nicholas Schwab
0
Votes |
6
Posts

Schedule C sounds like a dream

Nicholas Schwab
Posted

I haven't seen anybody write specifically about this before. After looking at hundreds of thousands of dollars in suspended passive losses, I'm planning to provide substantial services on my next house hack. This sounds like it would allow me to file an LLC, report on Schedule C, and then have my inevitable losses start to offset my W-2 income. No REP or STR needed. Self-employment tax will be required on the net gain, which will of course be 0 after property expenses and depreciation. Long-term rental with substantial services provided. I think my other rentals will still be considered passive. I know sometimes they get characterized and grouped together, but this would be very different with the schedule C and active nature of what I'm planning to do. Letting the tax tail wag the strategy? Yup. Any drawbacks? Anyone ever heard of someone doing this? I've been deep-diving this thought process for days haha

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

432
Posts
207
Votes
Ty Coutts
  • Lender
  • Colorado
207
Votes |
432
Posts
Ty Coutts
  • Lender
  • Colorado
Replied

Hello Nicholas, there are a few drawbacks: 

-Complexity and Scrutiny: This approach could attract scrutiny from the IRS, as it's not a typical way to manage rental properties. Ensuring that you meet all criteria for substantial services and properly reporting on Schedule C can be complex.

-Self-Employment Tax: While you anticipate the net gain to be zero after expenses and depreciation, any net income would be subject to self-employment tax, which can be significant.

-Recharacterization Risk: The IRS may recharacterize the activity if they do not agree with your classification of the services provided, potentially leading to penalties and back taxes.

-Administrative Burden: Managing substantial services may require more administrative work and potentially higher costs in terms of time and resources.

Some investors do use creative strategies to maximize tax benefits, but this particular approach of converting long-term rentals into an active business reported on Schedule C while providing substantial services is less common. Most investors either qualify as Real Estate Professionals or use short-term rentals to achieve similar goals. It’s advisable to consult with a tax professional who has experience with real estate investments to ensure that this strategy aligns with IRS regulations and your financial goals. I hope this helped!

business profile image
Ty Coutts - Aslan Home Lending
5.0 stars
37 Reviews

Loading replies...