First-Time Home Buyer
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 3 years ago,
Should I buy a personal house first in Silicon Valley?
Hi,
Background : I work in one of the tech companies in the bay area. I currently live in a rental unit 10 mins away from work which costs about $1600 per month including utilities. Pre-pandemic this was $2000. So it should soon go up I feel.
Coming to my finances, I have about $180,000 spread across stocks and cash. I also have about $30,000 in stocks vesting in October. Assuming my performance at work remains consistent I should be realizing about $70,000 in stocks every year. I am not accounting for the cash bonus in this. My pre-tax salary is $150,000. Im single and have been working for 4 years now.
I came across a mountain house which I really like. It has a great view and is listed just short of $1Mil.
I am confused if I should buy this as my personal residence first or should I buy out of state houses, build my passive income and then come back to buying a house for personal use later in life. Since I am an engineer and in tech most of my opportunities are in Silicon Valley and I dont want to move out of here.
If I do decide to purchase this house, I would be completely out of money for atleast a year after I make the 20% down. The property has an out house and a self sufficient basement that I could potentially rent out. But its secluded in the mountains and the chance of finding a renter is lower as compared to finding a renter in the city(Santa Clara). But I dont see myself investing in out of state rental properties for the foreseeable future unless I jump jobs for a better salary and a hefty signing bonus.
What path would you choose?
Thanks for any help I can get!