First-Time Home Buyer
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 4 years ago,
Deal Analysis, First time buyer, House Hacking old Triplex
Hey all,
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Let me know if I should post this in a different forum.
I'm a first time home buyer in California trying to buy something that will allow me to house hack and have a positive CoC return. This is the first property I've seen in my area in months where that looks remotely possible.
The details:
Asking price:
- 535k (pretty firm I think but maybe could go as low as 515k).
Units:
- 3 Bedroom SFH
- 2 x 1 Bedrooms/Studios
- An adjacent lot where I could park my van or build a tiny home.
Income:
- Hard to say but I think I could get 2k for the 3 bedrooms and 1k for each of the studios for a total of 4k.
Financing:
Traditional 3-5% down mortgage first time home buyers with an interest rate of about 2.5%.
The weird:
- This place is pretty old. The buildings have been grandfathered in but don't meet the current code. Seller claims there's a letter on file with the county but I would verify.
- As I said, OLD. There's been some work done on it and my agent (who used to represent the seller but currently does not) claims that it's rentable as-is. Any tips on common things to watch out for here? I'd probably have 10k for CapEx after closing but a 30k+ expense in the first 18 months would be really rough.
- It's currently in unincorporated county land but I understand the city plans to annex it in the next couple of years. This brings sewer which is nice and some slightly higher taxes but I don't really know what this means.
I know it's on me to evaluate the rentability of the property but any tips about older homes (70+ years) or city annexation would be greatly appreciated.
All the best and thanks again,
Harry