Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
First-Time Home Buyer
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
3
Votes
Robert Lopez
3
Votes |
7
Posts

Traditional vs Brrrr

Robert Lopez
Posted

Hi, I am looking to invest in my first buy and hold rental and I am not sure if I should take the traditional or brrrr approach. I certainly see the benefits to the brrrr approach but with no experience I sometimes believe I should take a traditional approach to minimize risk and learn the ins and outs of purchasing, maintaining, and managing a rental home. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

274
Posts
191
Votes
Olivia Radziszewski
  • Realtor
  • Chicago, IL
191
Votes |
274
Posts
Olivia Radziszewski
  • Realtor
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

@Robert Lopez- Everyone's journey is different! The most important thing is that you just take the plunge and get started. I, myself, started with the traditional approach and built up from there. 

Loading replies...