Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Managing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Jenny Lian
0
Votes |
3
Posts

wording for security reconciliation document

Jenny Lian
Posted

Hi Guys,

I never wrote a letter for this purpose before, please advise if this letter is appropriate. The context is the tenant caused a lot of damage to the property and I am keeping all the security deposit towards repairs. I am including an itemized list of repairs next page.

Thanks,

Dear [Tenant],

This letter is regarding your security deposit of $X for the property located at [address] for the lease period of Jan 2023 - 2024.

I am deducting $X from the security deposit for charges listed in the Resident Responsible Charges document. However, this doesn't cover all repair costs. Please issue a check to [Landlord] for the remaining $Y.


Sincerely,

Jenny Lian

Loading replies...