Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Managing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
1
Votes
Robert Farb
  • Del Mar, CA
1
Votes |
2
Posts

Landlord Paying Tenant Broker's Commission?

Robert Farb
  • Del Mar, CA
Posted

I've been managing the marketing of a couple of Industrial/Flex Units in San Diego that I own for the last few weeks. After many showings I have now successfully found a tenant that looks promising and we're currently in negotiation.

In the initial proposal that's been sent over I see that the Broker representing the prospective tenant is stipulating a 4% Leasing Fee that would be paid by me, The Landlord. This is on the Total Base Rent over the 5 Year term and amounts to almost 14K.

I have a problem with this on a number of levels...but was curious...is this typical? I don't know this guy, he was hired by the tenant NOT me and is representing them NOT me. Furthermore, if it becomes evident in the not to distant future that this relationship is not working and the Tenant departs...I'm stuck having paid a commission for something I neither wanted, needed or received in full.

I'm having a hard time determining why this expense should not be covered by the client who hired the Broker. If I'd hired a broker to assist me I'd pay him...but I didn't. Now I'm expected to pay for a guy that someone else hired to perform a service? Hmmmm....

Any feedback would be much appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

23
Posts
18
Votes
Max Reynolds
  • Property Manager
  • San Diego
18
Votes |
23
Posts
Max Reynolds
  • Property Manager
  • San Diego
Replied

Hey Robert - this is standard in the commercial real estate space. Typically Landlord's hire a broker to represent them for marketing their vacancies with a 6% leasing fee. If a tenant comes along with a broker, that fee is split 50/50 (3% to each side). If the broker has brought you a quality tenant, that is of great value and I would compensate him. You could wait for a tenant to come along unrepresented to avoid this fee however most tenants do have broker's representing them and then you face one of your biggest expenses, vacancy. My recommendations would be that the fee is 3%, commission is only applicable to base rent (if a NNN lease), only applicable to the initial term (not renewals), and is paid 1/2 upon lease execution and 1/2 upon the tenant opening for business. Your lease should state that if the tenant doesn't fulfill their lease term, they are responsible for reimbursing prorated commissions. At lease signing, you get 1st month's rent + security deposit so you won't have to come out of pocket. As both a broker and owner of a commercial property, I would pay the leasing commission.

Loading replies...