Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Central Valley, CA
3,729
Votes |
6,037
Posts

Direct Mail Saturation Strategy

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Central Valley, CA
Posted

I spend a lot of time sorting and analyzing my farm data in order to target motivated sellers. One reason is to control marketing costs. The other is so to make sure the right message gets to the right target.

I'm wondering about replacing the targeting with saturation instead. I have a new farm with 10K SFHs. For the sake of discussion, let's say I don't eliminate any addresses except corp owned, very highly valued props, and props purchased within the last 2 years. Say I end up with 8K SFHs. If I hit each address three times a year and my piece costs $.50, I'd be spending $12K on marketing for a year for this farm. I don't have to do but one deal to make it pay for itself.

There's a ton of waste in there because it includes all owner occupant and owners with no known distress. That being said it saves a ton a time on the lead sort and analysis. It also takes out the subjective nature of the sort. Currently, I don't send to most owner occupants unless I determine a possible motivation. So the owner occupant with a distress or motivation that I can't determine from data doesn't hear from me.

Thoughts?

Loading replies...