Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

66
Posts
21
Votes
Mike Waltman
  • Investor
  • Juno Beach, FL
21
Votes |
66
Posts

Current Home Value vs. Total Assessed Value- List Source

Mike Waltman
  • Investor
  • Juno Beach, FL
Posted

I've done some searching and haven't found anything on the forums so I'd figured I'd throw this out there because its an issue I'm debating on with my list source criteria.

My question isn't about what Current Home Value or Total Assessed Value are, I get the difference. What I'd like to know is what the pros and cons of using a listsource list with one criteria over the other for targeted marketing?

Is CHV just a more accurate estimate of what the home is worth? A list with CHV criteria is SIGNIFICANTLY more expensive (were talking 200-500 dollars more) than TAV. Is it worth it? 

I get a lot more leads per list with TAV (around 300-700 more). Not sure what to make of that fact in terms of quality vs quantity for targeted mailings utilizing a more expensive piece. 

It could be in my budget to pay extra for a quality list but I just need to know that its worth it, not just making it FEEL like I'm getting a better list because I shelled out a bunch more $$$$. I'm marketing for buy and hold, not wholesaling, if that makes any difference. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

546
Posts
445
Votes
Sean OToole
  • Investor
  • Truckee, CA
445
Votes |
546
Posts
Sean OToole
  • Investor
  • Truckee, CA
Replied

The answer won't be the same for everyone, as it depends on three things:

1. Your state

2. Your county assessor

3. How important know the value is to you.

Some states like CA, limit the increase in assessed value each year to a certain percentage. For those states assessed value really doesn't work at all if you need an estimate of current value.

At the assessor level, if they are doing their job the assessed value and the "current value" should be very close. Some assessors are prone to over-assess, others perhaps under. Regardless assessed value is updated once a year, whereas current value is updated monthly. If the assessor just updated, or its a slow moving market no worries. If it has been 11 months in a fast moving market, there could be a reasonable difference - though honestly probably within the margin of error of current value anyway.

Finally, do you need to see the value, or are you willing to do comps on the fly as leads contact you. If you don't need to see the value, then know need to include it in the export.

Personally I think now that current values (aka AVMs) are essentially free (thanks to the Zillow Zestimate), its ridiculous that they charge so much for them. Other services, like mine, include them for free, but unfortunately none that I know of in your area (yet).

Loading replies...