Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

10
Posts
7
Votes
Nick Hill
  • Clearwater, FL
7
Votes |
10
Posts

I don't trust List Source %Equity

Nick Hill
  • Clearwater, FL
Posted

Ok, so I'm building an absentee owners list is a small affluent college town.  The number of undefined leads in my geographical area is 38K. I whittled this down to about 3,000.  I then added 40-100% equity and I get a whopping 150ish total leads for absentee owners.  I am suspect... 

For kicks I changed the equity parameter to 1-100%.

According to List Source, out of my total geographical area (38k) there are only 10k properties with 1-100% equity.  When I add my other parameters the grand total is 299 leads with 1-100% equity.

Am I missing something?  Should I just use "Last Market Sale Date" >7 years instead?

Thanks.

Loading replies...