Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Solomon Solomonov
  • Brooklyn, NY
1
Votes |
16
Posts

Direct Mail - Why Length of Residence?

Solomon Solomonov
  • Brooklyn, NY
Posted

First off, I am new to BP and I have to say, I haven't come across a better source of education. It's like plugging into that machine from the Matrix to learn Jiu Jitsu (only you learn about real estate investing). 

I'm beginning to compile a mailing list from listsource.com using many of the filters recommended by some of the experts on BP. I have seen posts by experts (e.g. @Michael Q.) suggesting people add 7+ years length of residence as a filter. 

I want to understand the rational. If the purpose is to ensure that there is enough equity in the house, doesn't the equity % filter already account for that? On the other hand, you could presume that motivation to sell increases with time. But then, why not use 3+ years or 5+ years. It seems that using 7+ years would exclude some absentee homeowners who both used cash to finance their purchase and have experienced distress sooner than 7 years in. 

This is not just a theoretical question. My list shrinks significantly when I go from 3+ years to 7+ years. 

Any feedback is greatly appreciated. 

Loading replies...