Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tenant Screening
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
1
Votes
John Poling
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Punxsutawney, PA
1
Votes |
13
Posts

Tenant verification check

John Poling
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Punxsutawney, PA
Posted

Looking for an easier tenant verification site. The one that I have been using is too complex for my applicants. I'm using tenant verification. Com

I pay the fee and send it to the applicants email. They fill out the application and then it gives them too hard of a time to submit and asks a bunch of questions about me as the landlord that they can't answer. So they give up. Ive lost some good potential tenants due to this. There has to be a better way. Please let me know.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13
Posts
1
Votes
John Poling
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Punxsutawney, PA
1
Votes |
13
Posts
John Poling
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Punxsutawney, PA
Replied

@Jason Shackleton i do... I didn't realize that was an option. I'll have to check that out..

Loading replies...