Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tenant Screening
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes

ESA Letterhead has a personal phone number and a personal email, how to verify it?

Christina Banker
Posted

Hi All,

I have a tenant who submitted an ESA letter. The letterhead has the LCSW's personal email and a personal phone number. I asked them to provide a work email/phone or organizational email/phone but they said this LCSW is a private practice, so that is the email they use. I checked the license on the letter, and it seems legit.

My question is, can an LCSW without a Practice prescribe an ESA letter? My confusion is if they do not have an actual practice, how do patients make appointments and receive the ESA letter? I get that sometimes the LCSW can just be the tenant's friend or family. If that is the case, does the ESA letter still legit?

Thanks.

Loading replies...