Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Coronavirus Government Assistance Programs
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago,

User Stats

507
Posts
170
Votes
Kevin Phu
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Diego, CA
170
Votes |
507
Posts

Proposed: Landlord Relief Fund

Kevin Phu
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minnesota, introduced a bill in the U.S. House calling for a nationwide cancellation of rent and mortgage payments until the coronavirus pandemic has ended which also would include the creation of a Landlord Relief Fund that would cover the rental income lost. For a landlord to receive those funds, they would be required to follow federal guidelines for fair lending and renting practices for five years. The guidelines, which can also be found in the text here, are:

i
. a rent freeze;
ii
. just-cause evictions;
iii
. mandatory documentation with any just-cause eviction;
iv
. no source of income discrimination;
v
. coordination with local housing authorities to make new vacancies eligible
to voucher holders;
vi
. provision of 10 percent equity to tenants; and,
vii
. no admissions restrictions on the basis of:
1. sexual identity or orientation,
2. gender identity or expression,
3. conviction or arrest record,
4. credit history, or
5. immigration status.
viii
. Additionally, landlords cannot attempt to collect any back-rent when the
moratorium is lifted,
ix
. they cannot retaliate in any way against residents and
x
. they cannot report residents to debt collectors or debt services to harm
their credit.

Now, chances are that it would never get past the Senate and be signed into law but this is ridiculous. How do you guys interpret require VI "provision of 10 percent equity to tenants"? Is that saying the tenant's would have a right to 10% of the properties equity? I don't quite understand. 

Loading replies...