Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago,

User Stats

22
Posts
42
Votes
Robert Johnson
42
Votes |
22
Posts

St. Paul Renter Protection Law Declared Unconstitutional

Robert Johnson
Posted

From a news article.  Decision by federal judge. 

https://www.twincities.com/202...

"U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson granted the injunction on Monday, writing that it’s likely the landlords ultimately will win the case. The ordinance likely is unconstitutional in two ways, the judge wrote.


First, the landlords argued that it violates the 5th Amendment, which prohibits government from taking private property for public use without fair compensation.

“Plaintiffs claim that the ordinance operates as a per se taking because it singles out private landlords to ‘address a perceived, though vaguely identified, societal problem’ related to housing needs. The Court agrees,” Magnuson wrote.

Second, the landlords said the ordinance violates their 14th Amendment right to exclude people from their properties without due process."