Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes
Steven Burritt
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Sebastian, FL
2
Votes |
8
Posts

Rent and Mortgage Cancelation Act

Steven Burritt
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Sebastian, FL
Posted

Has anyone looked at this proposal from representative IIhan Omar of Minisota's 5th district? What she's proposing would put an end to RE investing as we know it.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

824
Posts
1,099
Votes
Joe P.
  • Philadelphia, PA
1,099
Votes |
824
Posts
Joe P.
  • Philadelphia, PA
Replied

Really? We're going to rehash this again after it was raised in April? Sigh. Fine.

There was concern that covid would be so widespread and damaging as to cripple the economy permanently. And, if most renters/mortgage holders lose their job due a complete and extended shut down, this bill was aimed at not creating yet another public health crisis by putting renters and homeowners on the street. A bit of an ominous projection, but lets say a meat plant which employs 80% of a town of mostly renters/homeowners shuts down for six months. Most of those people are blue-collar, paycheck-to-paycheck people. This was aimed at avoiding the socioeconomic destruction of that town, for example.

You may not agree with the approach, but it was not meant as a handout (although it is...just like everything else that the government has agreed to provide...it's all "funny money"), nor was it meant to destroy investors. Rents and mortgages would have been paid by government backed relief funds. That means renters get to stay, investors keep paying their mortgages. Not ideal for an investor, obviously, but would have taken care of the primary income and primary expense for the lot of us.

There's a million questions about the bill itself, and nuance is everything. IF covid had been worse than projected from a health and economic standpoint (100-200k deaths), this might have been something you'd see both sides shake hands on. You cant create a second public health crisis by putting thousands of thousands of people on the street.

Loading replies...