Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

66
Posts
15
Votes
Will K
  • Washington, Washington D.C.
15
Votes |
66
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

498
Posts
48
Votes
Xing Zhu
  • Durham, NC
48
Votes |
498
Posts
Xing Zhu
  • Durham, NC
Replied

The US housing price during the bubble period in comparison with housing markets in many other nations wasn't really high, even relative to the income.

The bubble should not just be defined by the size. We must also look at it from within instead just from without. In my opinion, what made the US hosing market a bubble a few years ago were the following four factors beside the high price level:

(1) The high leverage: The leverage was as high as 125% so that the mortgages couldn't be viewed as secured.

(2) Low quality of the debt: People with very low credit scores were able to finance cheaply and easily. You simply cannot do this in any other business.

(3) The non-recourse law: In other nations, such as Canada, there is no such law.

(4) Strategic Default promoted by an Arizona law professor: The mortgage structure wasn't designed to the extent to be viewed as a regular business debt. It it were, the rate needed to be much higher, at least higher than that of most high yield papers.

Policy makers and banks are currently taking steps to repair (1) and (2). Factor (3) is governed by laws of certain states, and therefore is beyond the power of federal government to make changes.

Factor (4) had changed the US housing culture forever. The lender has to recalculate the risk accordingly to decide the rate. Their mathematical models have to be redesigned.
Factor (4) couldn't be seen prior to the burst of the bubble. It was a brand new product.

Loading replies...