Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

350
Posts
122
Votes
Arthur Garcia
  • Specialist
  • San Dimas, CA
122
Votes |
350
Posts

BP's thoughts- Fed says to Expand Fannie and Freddie

Arthur Garcia
  • Specialist
  • San Dimas, CA
Posted

BP,

I am posting here to get your thoughts on this article:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/05/us-usa-fed-housing-idUSTRE8031SE20120105

In short, do you think a change in lending standards will be good for us? Or do you think "little guys" aka non-institutional investors are going to be screwed by this?

Let's discuss. . .

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Replied

The cost of credit isn't the problem for real estate investors. The ACCESS to capital is. Inane rules like limiting FNMA mortgages to 10 for individuals grossly distorts the market for certain borrowers. In short, the gov-mint should not be involved.

This quote:

//Begin Quote
Many Republicans accuse the companies of having fostered the shoddy underwriting practices that led to the financial collapse. However, the firms had drawn scrutiny long before the crisis because lawmakers believed their implicit government backing gave them a competitive edge in the mortgage market.
//End Quote

from the article pretty much sums it up for me. Why do we need the government in this market? Absent the government distorting the true cost of financing none of this mess would have been possible. Doing more of what doesn't work doesn't seem like a very good plan to me.

Loading replies...