Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3,143
Posts
1,065
Votes
Jeff S.
  • Specialist
  • Portland, OR
1,065
Votes |
3,143
Posts

Geithner talking, Greenspan too

Jeff S.
  • Specialist
  • Portland, OR
Posted

Was listening to Geithner talking to some senators and he was saying he'd like to see renters fill all the vacant houses. To facilitate that he said he'd have to take over Fannie and Freddie. Hmmm, I was thinking this could be good for investors. A little turn of attitude, pro biz. Wonder what could be done short of lowering rates even more? Better write-offs with faster depreciation would bring in more high earners.

Greenspan said one cheap solution to the housing glut would be to burn houses.

Kind of like burning wheat to stabalize prices. Guess you could have the homeless gather around to stay warm.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Replied

How about we try something shocking and get rid of the GSEs and government gimmicks altogether. We could do the completely rational thing and (gasp!) let the market for space work itself out naturally. I realize this may not be politically popular with the poor, unfortunate people that live in the best nation in the world. However, personal responsibility and a strong work ethic used to work just fine. I see no reason why it won't work again if we get rid of the gov-mint parasites that distort the whole cost of mortgage money.

Loading replies...