Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago,

User Stats

5,957
Posts
6,888
Votes
Dan H.
Pro Member
#2 Real Estate Success Stories Contributor
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
6,888
Votes |
5,957
Posts

Proposed regulation on real-estate purchases made in all cash

Dan H.
Pro Member
#2 Real Estate Success Stories Contributor
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
Posted

Proposal to regulate all cash offers to reduce use of RE to launder money.  Not sure what effect this will have on investors who make all cash offers or sellers whose RE for some reason does not qualify for traditional financing.  I suspect it will come down how successful the treasury is in their goal to minimize the burden on the real-estate industry.

Too much still is not known to know how big a burden these new regulations will be.  I like being able to purchase all cash without more bureaucracy (possibly less bureaucracy) than a financed purchase.  The cash purchases often provide the best opportunity for return.

Eliminating money laundering and the underlying crime is likely worth some additional burden.  The challenge is eliminating the money laundering opportunity while not being too burdensome to legitimate RE buyers and sellers.

WSJ:

In taking aim at a significant source of corruption, the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, announced a proposed regulation on real-estate purchases made in all cash. The initiative, subject to a public comment period, would seek to make nationwide current reporting requirements on transactions in 12 metropolitan areas with residential property selling for more than $300,000, officials said.

“Increasing transparency in the real-estate sector will curb the ability of corrupt officials and criminals to launder the proceeds of their ill-gotten gains through the U.S. real-estate market,” said Himamauli Das, FinCEN’s acting director. “Addressing this risk will strengthen U.S. national security and help protect the integrity of the U.S. financial system.”

Details of the initiative still to be worked out include which types of real estate, including commercial property, would be included. The U.S. Treasury’s goal is to minimize the burden on the real-estate industry while offering up a fuller accounting of property sales that could be used by law enforcement or national-security agencies, according to officials.

Shell-company real-estate purchases, while legal, have been used by money launderers because the deal can be made anonymously. Experts say such deals have been used by foreign leaders who have stolen money from their countries, human traffickers and other criminals. Property has been seized across the U.S., from Manhattan apartments to California mansions, but the problem remains.

More than $2.3 billion was laundered through U.S. real estate between 2015 and 2020, according to an analysis cited by the Treasury.

  • Dan H.
  • Loading replies...