Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

224
Posts
152
Votes
Matt Stricklen
  • Investor
  • Austin TX
152
Votes |
224
Posts

Backwards/ Retro Rental Calculator question

Matt Stricklen
  • Investor
  • Austin TX
Posted

Ok. Numbers people, please advise.

I'm working up a retroactive analysis on a deal, mostly to pat myself on the back but maybe also to show to later potential partners. 

In 2012 I purchased a duplex and house hacked until I moved out in year 6.

So the rent, with modest increases in the first 6 years is easy to calculate, but in year 6 it takes a big jump when I started leasing both sides instead of just 1 unit. 

So the question is, what is the best way to calculate the annual income growth as a percentage? The way the calculator is designed, that is a more or less constant rate through the lifetime of the deal, so I'm not sure how to determine that rate.

Any help is appreciated. 

  • Matt Stricklen
  • Loading replies...