Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Nicholas Alexander Cuaresma
  • Watford City, ND
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Short Comings of the Four Square Method?

Nicholas Alexander Cuaresma
  • Watford City, ND
Posted

Hello all!

I am wanting to create my own excel spreadsheet for analyzing deals.  I have been searching the forums and have found many people have already posted their own sheets.  I learn really well using excel and want to make one for my own understanding.  I will be using the four square method in my first iteration and as I continue to learn my hope is to add the more complex calculations.  My question to you all is what are the short comings of the four square method, if any?  Are there variables that are not accounted in this method?  On the BP youtube channel Brandon said that this method is more of a preliminary analysis, so is there a better way to crunch the numbers?  Any advice will help! Thanks

Loading replies...