Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago, 09/30/2018

User Stats

119
Posts
120
Votes
Omid A.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Portland, Or
120
Votes |
119
Posts

512% cash-on-cash return on one rental using BRRR strategy

Omid A.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Portland, Or
Posted

Hi BP,

Wanted to share a successful BRRR deal I finished recently, it was actually my first time using the BRRR strategy instead of just flipping the house and I must say I am hooked. Also, the title of this post can be a little confusing or unrealistic to those who don't know what the BRRR strategy entails, those who are versed in it likely immediately realized the reason the cash-on-cash was so high was that such a small amount of my capital was left in the deal after the refinance.

If you scroll below you can see photos of the finished product.

Here are the details:

I bought a property that had on it 2 detached single family homes on 1 tax lot, the city and the bank recognized it as a duplex even though it technically isn't a duplex. I paid $200k using private money to fund the entire purchase price. I spent about $75-80k renovating the front and back unit completely with new everything. My all-in cost after all of the renovation cost, financing cost, utilities, refinance fees and closing costs was about $305,000. After renovation was complete, I rented out one unit for $1,650 and the other for $1,500 for a combined $3,150 per month on a 12-month lease. Total cash flow after accounting for PITI expenses ONLY is $1,282 per month. The yield would obviously be a little lower after accounting for vacancy, capex, PM but 1) for the time being I am self-managing and 2) the property is fully renovated and turnkey so capex should be very minimal for the first few years at least.

The bank appraised the property at $440,000 and allowed me to do a cash-out-refinance at 70% loan-to-value. I took out the full 70% which came out to $308,000, leaving roughly $3,000 of my own cash into the deal.

When you look at this deal through a cash-on-cash analysis the yield looks insanely high but what that analysis fails to account for is the amount of equity I left in the deal. That equity could have been cashed out and put to use if I flipped the property but instead is parked in this rental property so there is some opportunity cost there that brings my true yield down further if you factor it in to calculate the return on equity. However, if I had cashed out I would have to pay the capital gains tax on the earnings. It was a hard decision trying to decide which way to take this deal and ultimately decided to make a long-term play on it and keep it, I think I will thank myself for it in the future. 

Loading replies...