Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
0
Votes
John Villaruel
  • Rochester, NY
0
Votes |
8
Posts

Evaluate Deal with 50% rule vs 2% rule

John Villaruel
  • Rochester, NY
Posted

I'm looking at the 2 duplexes below:

Prop A
Price: $72.5 (accepted offer)
Monthly Rental Income: $1500
25% down 6% interest 30 year fixed: $326/month

Prop B
Price: $44.9 (listed price)
Monthly Rental Income: $1100
25% down 6% interest 30 year fixed: $202/month

50% Rule Prop A
1500/2 = 750
750 - 326 = 424
424/2(duplex) = 212 per unit (at least $100 per unit to be good deal)

50 Rule Prop B
1100/2 = 550
550 - 202 = 348
348/2(duplex) = 174 per unit (at least $100 per unit to be good deal)

2% rule Prop A
72500 * .02 = 1450 rent per month to cash flow properly

2% rule Prop B
44900 * .02 = 898 rent per month to cash flow properly

I know i have to look into other factors but for this we can assume both units are comparable both in condition and area. I have priced rent conservatively based on rent for the areas.

Using these screening rules both properties look like good deals. Property B looks a little better than property A. What do you guys think? Am I calculating the 50% and 2% rules correctly?

Thanks for your advice!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,573
Posts
928
Votes
David Beard
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
928
Votes |
1,573
Posts
David Beard
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
Replied

John -- your analysis looks solid. Other considerations that come to mind:

Net Property Return:
Prop A = 9000/72500 = 12.4%
Prop B = 6600/44900 = 14.7%

Return on investment (ROI) in Year 1 with a 3/1 ratio of bank funds at 6% rate:
Prop A = 12.4+(12.4-6.0)*3 = 31.6%
Prop B = 14.7+(14.7-6.0)*3 = 40.8%

Leveraged ROI above 30% is excellent and generally where you want to be.

Though Prop B has a better apparent ROI, factors favoring Prop A are:
* should attractive higher-caliber tenant, thus reducing turnover, maint, vacancy time, and landlord time, all things being equal -- this will lower the expense ratio versus Prop B
* gets more of your capital working for you right now
* better economies of scale on loan closing costs
* Easier resale, as more lenders would finance at this size (you apparently have a "conventional" lender that will do the smaller loan on Prop B at the same terms, is that so?)

Sharpen your pencil on expenses, especially any differencese around who is paying utilities and takes care of the yard, or if age of buildings is considerably different.

Adjust purchase price in analysis for deferred maint. or large repairs/replacements that need to be done in the first year or two.

Good luck. Can you purchase both?

Loading replies...