Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
17
Votes |
122
Posts

Duplex Needs Analyzing

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
Posted

I am looking at duplex that grosses $1,590 per month and the sales price is $103,200. I am looking at approximately $9,540 in annualized expenses using the 50% rule. My monthly mortgage payment would be assuming a 20 year fixed rate loan at 7% with a 20% down payment roughly $640/mo. That brings me to a net positive cash flow for the year of $1,860. Is this a good deal for my first property? If not...this would be one heck of a tax shelter. :mrgreen:

Thanks for the help.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,196
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,196
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

I think the negative cash-flow determination is based on the fact that if the deal were 100% financed, it would lose about $5/month. So, essentially, it's break-even.

Remember, any negative cash-flow property can become cash-flow positive if you buy enough equity (i.e., more down-payment).

And that's essentially what is happening here. At 100% LTV, it's breakeven. At 80% LTV, it's cash-flow positive of about $75/unit/month.

The bigger issue is that even with the 20% down-payment, the cash-on-cash return is still only 9%, and that ignores the rehab/make-ready costs, the closing costs and loan costs associated with purchasing the property.

In this market, I don't see much reason to settle for 9% COC return long-term with a 20% down-payment.

Loading replies...