Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
17
Votes |
122
Posts

Duplex Needs Analyzing

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
Posted

I am looking at duplex that grosses $1,590 per month and the sales price is $103,200. I am looking at approximately $9,540 in annualized expenses using the 50% rule. My monthly mortgage payment would be assuming a 20 year fixed rate loan at 7% with a 20% down payment roughly $640/mo. That brings me to a net positive cash flow for the year of $1,860. Is this a good deal for my first property? If not...this would be one heck of a tax shelter. :mrgreen:

Thanks for the help.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,199
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,199
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

I think the negative cash-flow determination is based on the fact that if the deal were 100% financed, it would lose about $5/month. So, essentially, it's break-even.

Remember, any negative cash-flow property can become cash-flow positive if you buy enough equity (i.e., more down-payment).

And that's essentially what is happening here. At 100% LTV, it's breakeven. At 80% LTV, it's cash-flow positive of about $75/unit/month.

The bigger issue is that even with the 20% down-payment, the cash-on-cash return is still only 9%, and that ignores the rehab/make-ready costs, the closing costs and loan costs associated with purchasing the property.

In this market, I don't see much reason to settle for 9% COC return long-term with a 20% down-payment.

Loading replies...