Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 7 years ago,
Should I move forward?
Hello. I'm gunning to purchase my first investment property. While I was looking at more traditional three or four bedroom SFHs, I came across a FSBO 1 bed/1 bath 450 square foot home, built around 1950, being offered for $45,000. Even at $45,000 I think its a bit under market value, but I would hope to be able to get the seller down to $35,000 - $40,000. The house was renovated a bit in 2012 (nothing too fancy), including a new roof, has window unit a/c, gas heat, and includes lake rights to a chain of lakes (although its not right on the water). One of my bigger concerns is that it is on well and septic -- my concern is more that I've never dealt with that before -- but the owner said he installed a brand new septic system last year at considerable cost -- and, of course, I'd have both systems inspected as a condition of sale. The house is currently rented at $650/month. My thought it is paying for the house in all cash, enjoying the cash flow, and then, since I will have no mortgage, taking out a line of credit on the house to leverage into another rental property. Doing that, instead of putting down $30,000 - $40,000 on a more traditional $125,000 +/- home or duplex, would, I think allow me to acquire two properties a lot faster.... plus, again, the added bonus of the cash flow on the first property. But... I'm a little nervous about a 1/1 home and septic/well -- I understand that selling, when I choose to, might take a little longer, but, at this point, I think I would just hang on to it as a rental and milk it for the cash flow. Does this make sense as a strategy to others? Or would you abandon the idea and just focus on something more traditional and with public water/sewer? Thank you very much in advance!