Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Richard F.
  • Los Angeles, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

70% ARV Assumption --> Not with Transfer/Recordation Tax (MD)!?

Richard F.
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hello All,

My computer processor has been completely exhausted trying to help me determine whether my conclusion is valid in regards to investing in Maryland (Montgomery, Prince George's, Anne Arundel, Baltimore Counties, etc). I'm finding that:

  • An All-Cash Offer in Maryland is basically equivalent to a Financed Offer in most other states? 
    • Due to Maryland's hefty Transfer/Recordation taxes, which totals 2.4% of Purchase Price (Buyer Expense on REO properties), I'm finding my potential Buyer's Costs to be 4% of PP, even with All Cash 
      • Even on standard/non-reo deals, I'm looking at 2.68% Buyer Costs, which is far and above my past investments in California

My essential questions are:  

(1) In Maryland, are investors finding deals below the 70% ARV figure to compensate for the high taxes/transfer costs?

(2) How are investors who utilize financing/hard money lenders able to make this area work, seeing that a loan would add another 2%-3% to the Fixed Costs?

  • I know that in order to hit my profit metrics I need to further reduce the [% Discount ARV] figure, but ideally would like to get some feedback from others in the area who are dealing with these county/state costs - and how they adapt to profit.

Thank you all for your wisdom!!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assumptions:

1) Purchase Price (PP): $150,000   (just over 70% ARV Rule)

2) Financing: Interest-Only Loan - All Project Costs

3) ARV: $300,000

4) Rehab Cost: $65,000

5) Fixed Costs: $52,284 (17.41% of ARV)

  • Buying Costs: $5,951  -  (4.0% of PP, or 1.98% of ARV)
    • Inspection: $400
    • Settlement Charge: $900
    • [Transfer/Recordation Tax: $3,675]
    • [Government Recording Charge: $60]
    • Survey: $195
    • Owner's Title Policy: $721
  • Holding Costs: $11,148  -  (3.7% of ARV)
    • Assuming 8-Month Hold Period
      • Loan Payments: $6,532
      • Property Taxes: $1,896
      • Utilities: $1,600
      • Insurance: $720
      • Maintenance: $400
  • Selling Costs: $35,185  -  (11.73% of ARV)
    • 6% Commissions: $18,000
    • Home Warranty: $400
    • Settlement Charge: $425
    • [3% Seller Concession (standard for area): $9,000]
    • [Transfer/Recordation Tax: $7,200]
    • [Government Recording Charge: $60]
    • Termite Report: $100

6) Total Costs:  $117,284

7) Profit:  $32,716

8) ROI:  ~14%  (21% Annually)

  • Not very attractive in my opinion

Loading replies...