Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Nitin S.
  • San Francisco, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Should I take $600k equity out of my house to buy more property?

Nitin S.
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Hi Gurus,


My primary residence just in last 3 to 4 years has built 600k equity & have 500k on loan with 2.75% for 15yr fixed. Living in Silicon Valley. My question is should I sell this home and buy cheaper property as primary residence little far and use cash to buy more investment properties? This will give me 400K in cash. OR Keep living in it as interest rate is so good and use home equity loan to buy investment properties?  Basically, want to know what you would do if you are in my shoes? Any other advice or planning will be appreciated. Much thanks!

I also have 200k cash(some in stock market) which can be liquidated quickly. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,663
Posts
3,093
Votes
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
3,093
Votes |
2,663
Posts
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

Unless you have a great deal available for you to buy right now, right in front of you, then I would wait for the next down market and then ask your question again ... I tend to behave counter cyclically ... meaning that when the market is hot and everyone is running towards REI I play it conservative with my leverage and underwriting of deals. When the market tanks and everyone is running away from REI, that is when I leverage up and get more aggressive. All of that to me is not necessarily directly related to a hot or cold market so much as it is the availability of great deals ... when there are more great deals to be had I want to buy more even if that means taking on leverage to do it, and that typically happens if/when the market corrects. However, if I can find a great deal in a hot market, I absolutely will buy it, it is just that it doesn't happen as often then. As to your primary residence, if you can afford to live there, enjoy it, and it has served you well financially, then I would not sell it ... if it is too much house for you, or you are struggling to keep up with payments and maintenance, then yes you should probably sell it. I would NOT try to time the market to sell it at peak unless you had another compelling reason like mentioned above for wanting/needing to sell anyway ... remember, even if you hit the peak for this RE cycle (which is hard enough to do), it does not mean you will be selling out at the global all time peak ... it reminds me of something my parent's did in the 1980's, they timed the market perfectly and sold at the peak for that RE cycle ... it was a triplex a few blocks from the ocean they sold for $150k, value stayed flat for years after they sold but today is probably worth >$2M.

Loading replies...