Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65d4/b65d47d0c29cee5117245c73ad4e3f5943c232d7" alt="Paisley H.'s profile image"
Deal Analysis Help - newbie!
I found a quadplex for $300,000. Rent is $3080, so it meets the 1% rule. I would put 20% down for 30 years, so it would cash flow about $288/mo by the 50% rule (less than the ideal $100/door). But it was built in 1998 and is in pretty good condition, I don't think repairs will be excessive.
The thing is, when I enter it in the Bigger Pockets rental property calculator, I can make it look great or I can make it look awful by adjusting the %s for capex, repairs, and vacancy. At 5% vacancy, 5% capex ($154/mo), 5% repairs ($154/mo), no property mgmt, the return is over 6% and cash flow is good. But increase the capex and repairs from 5% to 10% and it goes negative.
I just don't know if I'm overanalyzing this, it meets the 1% rule, it's a nice property in a good area. Should I wait for a better deal? I could purchase two turnkey properties for the same amount that would cash flow a similar amount, according to the turnkey company of course. And I think the turnkey SFRs would be easier to sell in an exit strategy scenario and would be more likely to appreciate.
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97078/97078176de68e1da6db03c47568180a2fa105153" alt="Ben Wilkins's profile image"
@Paisley H. - you are certainly not over-analyzing, but are instead doing the correct research.
As @Justin Owens pointed out, the 1% rule is just a rule of thumb that is used for quick estimations. It's a lot quicker to evaluate a property to determine if it meets the 1% rule, than it is to calculate all of the expenses. If a property passes the 1% rule, then it may be worth looking further into - that's what the rule is intended to be used for.
Just about any deal can be made to look good by the numbers, but it may turn out to be a disaster later on if you don't account for expenses (especially maintenance and CapEx). Don't fudge these percentages in order to justify a purchase. Instead, let the numbers convince you that the purchase is worth it.
A better approach when manipulating numbers is to decrease the purchase price until you get to the cash flow, Cap rate, ROI that you want. Once you find a purchase price that makes your numbers work - that is when you know how much the property is worth for you.
Don't play with the CapEx to make a property "work" - instead, find the purchase price that makes the property worth it to you.