Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
1
Votes
Paisley H.
  • Dumas, TX
1
Votes |
7
Posts

Deal Analysis Help - newbie!

Paisley H.
  • Dumas, TX
Posted

I found a quadplex for $300,000. Rent is $3080, so it meets the 1% rule. I would put 20% down for 30 years, so it would cash flow about $288/mo by the 50% rule (less than the ideal $100/door). But it was built in 1998 and is in pretty good condition, I don't think repairs will be excessive.

The thing is, when I enter it in the Bigger Pockets rental property calculator, I can make it look great or I can make it look awful by adjusting the %s for capex, repairs, and vacancy. At 5% vacancy, 5% capex ($154/mo), 5% repairs ($154/mo), no property mgmt, the return is over 6% and cash flow is good. But increase the capex and repairs from 5% to 10% and it goes negative. 

I just don't know if I'm overanalyzing this, it meets the 1% rule, it's a nice property in a good area. Should I wait for a better deal? I could purchase two turnkey properties for the same amount that would cash flow a similar amount, according to the turnkey company of course. And I think the turnkey SFRs would be easier to sell in an exit strategy scenario and would be more likely to appreciate.  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

377
Posts
314
Votes
Ben Wilkins
  • Rental Property Investor
  • York, PA
314
Votes |
377
Posts
Ben Wilkins
  • Rental Property Investor
  • York, PA
Replied

@Paisley H. - you are certainly not over-analyzing, but are instead doing the correct research.

As @Justin Owens pointed out, the 1% rule is just a rule of thumb that is used for quick estimations. It's a lot quicker to evaluate a property to determine if it meets the 1% rule, than it is to calculate all of the expenses. If a property passes the 1% rule, then it may be worth looking further into - that's what the rule is intended to be used for.

Just about any deal can be made to look good by the numbers, but it may turn out to be a disaster later on if you don't account for expenses (especially maintenance and CapEx). Don't fudge these percentages in order to justify a purchase. Instead, let the numbers convince you that the purchase is worth it.

A better approach when manipulating numbers is to decrease the purchase price until you get to the cash flow, Cap rate, ROI that you want. Once you find a purchase price that makes your numbers work - that is when you know how much the property is worth for you.

Don't play with the CapEx to make a property "work" - instead, find the purchase price that makes the property worth it to you.

Loading replies...