Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

68
Posts
44
Votes
Bryan Reid
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Lexington, KY
44
Votes |
68
Posts

#1 Item new investors Neglect when Analyzing Deals

Bryan Reid
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Lexington, KY
Posted

With all the focus I see on calculating investment returns, something I consistently see missing in the analysis is: RISK.

There are two sides to consider when analyzing any investment: Risk and Return.

As a community, we do a good job (and BP's tools help here) at predicting our potential returns.  But very rarely do I see these analyses tempered by any effort to quantify the risk side of the equation.

I like to perform a simplified risk analysis as described in linked article, as well as running multiple return analyses with progressively bleaker assumptions.

But I'd be very curious to hear what others think/do, too - how do you consider risk?

Am I being overly cautious in my approach?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,286
Posts
3,789
Votes
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
3,789
Votes |
3,286
Posts
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

@Bryan Reid I look at risk differently because I'm buy-and-hold.  From my perspective it's about the property being able to self-support.  What if expenses increase 50%?  What if I have to drop rents 20%?  How many vacant units can I have and still pay the mortgage without coming out of pocket?  It gets more "fun" with commercial properties that have 5 to 7 year fixed rates with a balloon at the end of it.  You have to think about refinancing at that point, servicing the new debt, etc.  Then you have to marry the risk (read: high debt) with the tax consequences (less mortgage interest to use against property income).  There's no free lunch.  

Loading replies...