Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

#1 Item new investors Neglect when Analyzing Deals
With all the focus I see on calculating investment returns, something I consistently see missing in the analysis is: RISK.
There are two sides to consider when analyzing any investment: Risk and Return.
As a community, we do a good job (and BP's tools help here) at predicting our potential returns. But very rarely do I see these analyses tempered by any effort to quantify the risk side of the equation.
I like to perform a simplified risk analysis as described in linked article, as well as running multiple return analyses with progressively bleaker assumptions.
But I'd be very curious to hear what others think/do, too - how do you consider risk?
Am I being overly cautious in my approach?
Most Popular Reply

@Bryan Reid I look at risk differently because I'm buy-and-hold. From my perspective it's about the property being able to self-support. What if expenses increase 50%? What if I have to drop rents 20%? How many vacant units can I have and still pay the mortgage without coming out of pocket? It gets more "fun" with commercial properties that have 5 to 7 year fixed rates with a balloon at the end of it. You have to think about refinancing at that point, servicing the new debt, etc. Then you have to marry the risk (read: high debt) with the tax consequences (less mortgage interest to use against property income). There's no free lunch.