Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

45
Posts
4
Votes
John Romero
  • Developer
4
Votes |
45
Posts

Multi Family Numbers - Do they work?

John Romero
  • Developer
Posted

Hi Everyone! I'm trying to run numbers on a potential duplex property i've been considering in NJ. (One unit is a 2br/1bath that can bring in $1200, the other is a 4br, 2bath that can bring in $2000.)

[i]Purchase price: $300k (Can be purchased for this amount)
Appraisal price: $470k (Currently on Zillow)
Sold in '07 for: $500k (From NJ tax information)
Current comps: $450-475k
Monthly Rent: $3200
Monthly Mortgage: $2400 (Including all taxes/insurance)[/i]

I've been doing some homework on BP regarding ratios and percentages. Trying to learn but still confused. Do the ratios take into consideration appreciation? The formulas i've been running are specifically how rent should be 2% of the purchase price. In this case, it's not; it's 1%. Expenses should also be factored in at 50% of the rent.

Ideally (from what i've been reading)
2% of 300k = $6k/month (what the rent SHOULD be)
50% of 6k/month = $3k/month (what the expenses SHOULD be)

So...

If expenses are $3000, and my mortgage is $2400; the total monthly carrying cost would be $5400.

Factor in rent of $3200/month and you'd be left with a loss on this property of $2200/month.

This can't be correct, is it? It seemed good, the mortgage was at least $800 less than rent every month, plus the property is in a good area, appraising for $175k more than the possible purchase price.

Am I missing something important in my math? Any tips to help out?

Thanks so much.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,127
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,127
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

I can tell from just the purchase price and the rents this is a bad deal. $300K for $3200 in rent just won't work.

That said, the 2% rule doesn't work for $1200 and $2000 rents, either.

Rent: $3200
Expenses: $1600
Payment: $1798 ($300K, 6%, 30 years)
Monthly Loss: $198

You cannot figure the rent from the price. You have to figure the rent from the market, then work out the price. For this place to cash flow $200 a month, you can pay no more than about $230-235K.

None of this considers appreciation, which is purely a crap shoot.

Loading replies...