Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

31
Posts
1
Votes
Sergio Avina
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Whittier, CA
1
Votes |
31
Posts

Mutifamily Tri in Los Angeles. Deal or No Deal?

Sergio Avina
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Whittier, CA
Posted

Hello BP community,

I could use your help on a potential property purchase in Los Angeles. All responses welcome (yes/no response & detailed responses). The property is a triplex with converted garage (unpermitted) into a one bedroom with kitchen and 1 bathroom. I plan on co-habitating one house (3+1) and renting out the rest.  My current rental cost ($1,750/month), own zero properties, wish to stop paying rent, and purchase my first rental property.  Cash-flowing properties in LA are nearly impossible to find.  Do you think this is a good deal in the LA market? It seems like a good deal from the perspective of paying minimal rent ($185 out of pocket rent). 

Accepted price: $700,000 in City of Commerce. Combined Rents: $5,000/month (based on 3.9% int rate). Property mix is 3+1, 2+1, 2+1 & converted garage (1+1).

Monthly Expenses:

  • P & I (based on 10% down): $2,958
  • HO insurance: $130
  • Mortgage insurance: $394
  • Property tax: $741
  • Vacancy and property management: 5% of rents (managed by me): $290
  • Repairs: 1% of purchase price per year: $6,300 ($525/mo)
  • Various city expenses: (trash, water, etc) $150

P&I (plus PMI): $4,220

Total expenses/month: $965

Monthly rents of $5000 - $4,220 - $965 = cash flow per month -$185 (this is my rent while co-habitating one house. total rents will come up to $5,700 when I move out). 

What am I missing? Is this a good long term deal? 

I appreciate everyone's feedback!

SA

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,093
Posts
2,359
Votes
Lee Ripma
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Prairie Village, KS
2,359
Votes |
2,093
Posts
Lee Ripma
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Prairie Village, KS
Replied

@Sergio Avina

Make sure you dial in the expenses of water and garbage (I made some assumptions). The units may not be submetered so you might have to pay more utilities than you're thinking, make sure you account for that. If you self manage and the place is fully rented with a 5% vacancy you have a positive cash flow of $638. So if you take off that 1+1 you'll have -$562 in cash flow. If you take off that 3+1 you'll have -$1,162. If I were you I would live in the smaller unit and maybe airbnb it when you're out of town. You could also think about making one of the 2+1 into an airbnb if you think you can get more than 1500 a month and you don't mind managing it. You might be able to get longer term airbnb folks in there, maybe someone who needs the place for a month or two and then you can get a lot more for the unit then if it were long term. The appraisal will likely come back at whatever you're paying for the place, so 700k (appraisals are total BS if you ask me). 

You say you want to get out of renting BUT you're going to have to plunk down at least $600 a month in CapEx and repairs (make sure you're saving it, could be even more than that, folks on here will say in SoCal its 400/mo/unit). If you live in the unit that you want to live in then you'll be negative $1162 a month. Your 70k in down payment amortized over 5 years is an additional $1166. So you're losing $2,929 a month to buy in place in LA and your rent is far less than that without the hassle (and may even be subject to rent control). So unless you have appreciation in this deal then it doesn't make a whole lot of financial sense. It might make emotional sense. You want to own something, you want to learn how to remodel yourself, it feels good to say you own a house, etc. The tax deductions won't add up to that difference between your current rent of 1750 and 2,929 a month (1179 a month or 14k a year). The math I just did about is why I pay 2800/mo to rent an apartment in a nice neighborhood in LA and buy rental properties in Kansas City.

Property in CA and LA is not the same as in other parts of the country. We are in an appreciation market. So do you see good things in this area? Do you see more demand for rentals in the area? Do you believe in the City of Commerce? If you're willing to bank on that appreciation, then this could be a buy. 

I have the BP analysis this is based on but it's in a pdf which it isn't letting me link. PM me and I'll send it to you. 

Loading replies...