Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Ngoc Nguyen
  • Pleasanton, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Seller financing with Subject-to

Ngoc Nguyen
  • Pleasanton, CA
Posted

Hello everyone,

I need help on this specific deal. I am speaking with a seller regarding a property in Sacramento, CA. The seller is willing to do 'subject-to'. I was wondering is there any way to do a creative deal combining 'subject-to', seller financing, and a conventional loan? My ultimate goal would be to be able to buy this property, rehab a little so that is appraises where I have 20-30% equity where I can rent it out for 1450 and cash flow $300 monthly with as little cash outlay as possible.

So here are a few ways to purchase that I thought of. Please let me know if there's anything incorrect with my thinking. 

1. Buying 'subject-to' and the remaining be funded through a conventional loan. Would this be possible? 

2. Owner finance 20-30% (around 50K) and the remaining funded through conventional loan.

3. Doing both 'subject-to' and owner finance and the remaining funded through conventional loan.

4. Buying conventionally and downing 20% but I would like to keep my capital.

Here are some info:

Property = good condition. Repair costs may be 5-10k just for paint, new doors, and some landscaping]

Occupancy = has tenant. I don't know what amount it is renting for though.

ARV = 240k

Seller asking = 210k

Rent comps = 1450

Seller first mortgage = 92k

Property Taxes = 2230

Insurance = unsure (500-1000)

Also, according to Zillow this property was listed on August 2016 until March 2017 priced at 240k and did not sell. Now, owner is trying to sell on his own.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

112
Posts
62
Votes
Jesse Hinaman
  • Lender
  • Sacramento, CA
62
Votes |
112
Posts
Jesse Hinaman
  • Lender
  • Sacramento, CA
Replied

Sorry to break it to you, but you cannot have one existing 1st position mortgage that you put as "subject to", and then get another conventional loan, without paying off the original 1st.
Even hard money lender will require first position. You can do "subject to" and record a note for the seller financed portion. Then cash from yourself for remainder or have a private loan from someone willing to be in 3rd position (would have to offer them substantial interest rate incentive to take on that risk).
If going this route, you will definitely have a pretty messy title history creating more complications for you when going to refi or resell.

Loading replies...