Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

77
Posts
41
Votes
Brad Cogswell
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
41
Votes |
77
Posts

Estimating expenses too conservatively?

Brad Cogswell
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Hey all,

Wanted to get your opinion here. I'm investing in California, and have been looking at a number of duplexes. After gross rent, I'm deducting an immediate 30% off the top for variable expenses - Vacancy at 5%, Repairs at 5%, Capex at 10%, and Property Management at 10%. Am I being too conservative where I will make it too difficult to find a deal at all based on those assumptions?

In the example below, I'm left with $323 in monthly cash flow with a cap rate of 7.7% and CoC return of 9.1%, which doesn't seem high enough for me to pull the trigger. Below is the pro-forma to take a look. Thanks!

Loading replies...