Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

77
Posts
46
Votes
Thomas Mattausch
  • Investor
  • Seattle, WA
46
Votes |
77
Posts

Proving Established Use / Grandfathered Status

Thomas Mattausch
  • Investor
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Hello BP! This is one part success story, one part discussion prompt. 

This morning I threw a hail mary and it went for a touchdown! Didn't even have to push the defender to the ground, as you normally do in a hail mary - trigger warning, Packers fans ;)

I had been challenged by the land use permit planner when my architect applied for substantial renovations to a grandfathered duplex in a single family zone. In Seattle, to prove established (grandfathered, legal) use, you must show a permit for the use, or prove that the use existed prior to 1957, which has been established as a sort of "ancient amnesty" date. 

I put on my researcher hat, paid for a $25 for a 100 article archives subscription to the text searchable Seattle Times database, typed the house and street numbers inside quotes, and got to readin'. 

First, I was thrilled to discover that the proprietor of the "Seattle Grandmothers' Club" resided at our house. 

Fantastic! And useless. But look at that hat!

The next big discovery, however, was a slam dunk!

Dare I say... Boomshakalaka!

It is not completely airtight as they could ask for proof it was used as a separate apartment and not used by the homeowner. However, it's quite strong proof and I'm hopeful it will be accepted. 

Also, one other interesting note that I saw in the agencies' tip sheet on establishing use is this passage: 

"If a use not allowed under the current zoning commenced under permit, or a permit for the use has been granted and has not expired, or substantial progress has been made toward construction of a structure to be occupied by the use, then Seattle DCI recognizes the use as “established” in our records, and therefore legally nonconforming."

That bolded phase is quite curious! Does this scenario presume that potentially erroneous permits were issued prior to construction? Prima facie, it doesn't say that, just that you have to get a bunch of progress done towards building what you want to have there. 

Just wanted to share that lucky find this morning, and ask for any other anecdotes or strategies for proving continuous use in Seattle or elsewhere.