Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

34
Posts
3
Votes
Ken DiPietro
  • LaVale, MD
3
Votes |
34
Posts

A legal question.

Ken DiPietro
  • LaVale, MD
Posted

To the experts here,

Perhaps asking for legal advice is inappropriate in this forum but if I could get an off-the-record opinion I would be deeply appreciative.

The scenario is this, if I were to locate a property owner who is in the process of being foreclosed on, offer pay off their overdue payments, take over their loan payments, and hand them some money to move with, am I opening myself up for any risk?

This arrangement would be made through an attorney and the title for the home would be held by the lawyer until such time as the loan was paid off when it would be deeded over to me.

The intent is to save the closing costs associated with a loan and hopefully pick up a loan where the bulk of my payment would be going towards the principal. This also means that this deal would be done privately without the lender's knowledge.

Thanks,

Ken

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,981
Posts
659
Votes
Ryan Webber
  • Wholesaler
  • Amarillo, TX
659
Votes |
1,981
Posts
Ryan Webber
  • Wholesaler
  • Amarillo, TX
Replied

As Justin referred to, with a Subject To deal the biggest risk is the Due On Sale Clause. If title is transferred the DOS Clause allows the bank to accelerate the note and foreclose on the property.

As Justin referenced the biggest risk comes when you change the insurance over. One way to mitigate that is to add your name to the insurance without taking the original owner's name off. You would be responsible for paying it, but then the original owners name would still be on the policy. You would have to get the original owner to sign off on any insurance proceeds but it won't alert the bank to the title transfer.

I would also echo Justin here that you must get the property deeded to you at the onset of the deal. The risk without having a recorded deed is just not worth it.

Loading replies...