Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

170
Posts
46
Votes
Sean Autry
  • CPA
  • Pasadena, CA
46
Votes |
170
Posts

Help! Are My Assumptions Reasonable?

Sean Autry
  • CPA
  • Pasadena, CA
Posted

Hi All-  Newbie investor here, searching for my first rental property.  This has been a goal of mine for many years and I'm finally in a place to pull the trigger.

I live in So. Cal and (though sparse) I'm able to find a number of deals right on the MLS that cash flow reasonably well based on my model- to the tune of 9% - 17% cash on cash (levered up from 5% - 8% cap). I've heard over and over again that getting those kinds of returns in CA (absent appreciation) is pretty uncommon.

SO... What am I missing?  Are those returns realistic? I feel like I must be missing something.  I'm using the below to arrive at my monthly net cash flow number:

  • +Rental Income
  • (-) Vacancy Assumption = 8% of rent
  • (-) Mgmt Fees = 10% of rent
  • (-) Mortgage Interest Expense = 4% rate
  • (-) HOAs = Actual
  • (-) Insurance = 6.8% of annual rent
  • (-) Property Tax = Actual per MLS
  • (-) Repair/Maint = 10% of rent
  • (-) Gardner = $50/mo
  • = Net Rental Income
  • (-) Mortgage Principal Paydown
  • =Net Monthly Cash Flow

Any input is very much appreciated.  Thanks!

Some Geography Context:  I'm looking in San Bernadino, Apple Valley, San Jacinto, Hemet, Adelanto, Riverside, LA, and other low-price areas.  I am also interested in out of state investing, but I'll leave those questions/comments for another post.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,770
Posts
3,665
Votes
Aaron Mazzrillo
  • Investor
  • Riverside, CA
3,665
Votes |
2,770
Posts
Aaron Mazzrillo
  • Investor
  • Riverside, CA
Replied

San Bernadino - Anything here cash flowing is probably south of Baseline. I wouldn't want to own that junk.

Apple Valley - I haven't done much up in the high desert, but I hear from my friends who own houses up there that the tenant base is pretty bottom of the barrel.

San Jacinto - Not a bad area. Not a great area.

Hemet - This is where felons go when they get out of prison early.

Adelanto -  This is where people who are going to end up in prison live now.

Riverside - I can't imagine you're seeing any real cash flowing deals on the MLS in Riverside. Houses are quite expensive at this point in the market. Rents are strong. If you bought here 4 years ago you'd be killing it.

LA - Can't provide any details. Most of my deals here have been wholesaled 


Loading replies...