Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

48
Posts
14
Votes
Red Peterson
  • Sycamore, IL
14
Votes |
48
Posts

Question on 2% rule of thumb mentioned in podcasts.

Red Peterson
  • Sycamore, IL
Posted
Heard it more than once in podcasts that a good rule of thumb is getting a property rented out for 2% of the purchase price. Question: which market is this applicable? Is this only on certain states and expensive properties? Has anyone been able to get like $2k rent from a 100k property or something similar in this price range? Thank you in advance for all inputs.😊

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

39
Posts
54
Votes
John Lee
  • Santa Ana, CA
54
Votes |
39
Posts
John Lee
  • Santa Ana, CA
Replied

Being in Southern California, there is almost no chance you will come close to the 2% rule, especially for a SFH. This rule is far more likely to be achieved on a $30k house (requires only $600/month rent). There are a lot of places in the US that have houses like this, but many are in C or D neighborhoods. A lot of out-of-state turnkey companies get close to this 2% rule, but the risks are higher (vacancies, unexpected repairs/damages, evictions).

I've seen it often stated as the 1% rule in many areas, especially in better neighborhoods. However, in SoCal, you still only achieve that 1% rule in multi-families, not in a SFR.

Loading replies...