Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago,

User Stats

206
Posts
86
Votes
Claude Boiron
  • Real Estate Educator, Mentor, Investor
  • Toronto, Ontario
86
Votes |
206
Posts

Added $5M value to a building

Claude Boiron
  • Real Estate Educator, Mentor, Investor
  • Toronto, Ontario
Posted

Identified an opportunity due to the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) launching their FIT (Feed-in-tariff) Program.
Several years were spent applying for a FIT contract to place a roof-top solar system on 120 Industry Street, Toronto (our 180,000 sq.ft. industrial building), and determining the optimal system size.
With the guidance of an excellent Electrical Engineer, who happened to be an MBA as well, we created a complicated but thorough spreadsheet model which called for an over-sizing of the solar panels versus the inverter size.
Due to the "tiered" system OPA had developed to pay varying dollar amounts per kWh, depending on the size of the nameplate capacity (size of the inverter), we found that doubling the amount of panels in relation to the inverter offered maximum "bang for the buck".
3.5 years later, the 500kW system on a 250kW nameplate capacity inverter went live (early November, 2013).

Since we never had a mortgage on the building, historically, it was easy to finance the solar system by way of a new, small, first mortgage on the property.

The building had a Net Operating Income or approximately $600K originally, but with the addition of this AAA, government "tenant" on the roof, we increase the NOI to around $1M.

This was an opportunity which I believe only comes around a handful of times in one's life, so I'm certainly not expecting to do quite this well on every Real Estate investment.

Loading replies...