Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago,

User Stats

128
Posts
23
Votes
Mitch H.
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
23
Votes |
128
Posts

Can you get this to CF?

Mitch H.
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
Posted

Ran across this deal on the MLS. Side by side 2bd/1ba, B location in West/Central Denver, listed at $450K. I did a quick analysis and cannot even get it to CF. I ran it as owner occupied 3.5% down financing, and assumed each side could rent for $1,200 so $2,400 total. Even assuming an aggressive 28% total expenses (no Management Fee) I can barely get it to break even after P+I, let alone return any meaningful Cash on Cash.

On top of this, while functional looking, the interior could use an update.  The exterior looks a little sadder, and the roof looks like its well into its useful life.

Does anyone care to add their $0.02? Do you have better assumptions?

Loading replies...